November 4, 2016 6:56 AM HomeMorning ReadsMorning Reads for Friday November 4, 2016 Morning Reads for Friday November 4, 2016 By Ginny Morning Reads, Politics 9 Comments Woodruff raises big money. Methinks the Mayor, he doth protests too much. Bill Murray, national treasure. Sigh. Will they be telling the boys and girls can’t be in the pool at the same time again? Oh, snort. Just let boys be boys. You mean, there’s more? History always repeats itself. Now Brexit will be debated to death. Cool, does that mean we all get food replicators? AI and Art. See, math can be fun. Plus, Hamilton! Share this:TwitterFacebookTumblrRedditEmailPrint Related About Author Ginny 9 Comments Noway2016 Buchanan continues to hit it out of the park. Thanks, Pat! http://buchanan.org/blog/hillarys-high-crimes-misdemeanors-125951 November 4, 2016 7:34 AM Log in to Reply Benevolus The scientific process seems to have been corrupted by capitalism. It used to be that you would have reputable researchers from reputable institutions submitting their work to reputable publications, after which other researchers would follow up, all in the name of furthering knowledge. Now there are so many scientists and so many institutions, who knows what is legit or not. Many institutions reward their researchers for getting published, which encourages them to submit early and often whether it is scientifically justified or not. And there is little financial motivation to follow up someone else’s work. Altruism is being strangled! November 4, 2016 8:35 AM Log in to Reply Noway2016 “whether it is scientifically justified or not…” Thanks for finally recognizing the Global…’scuse me…Climate Change hoax! There is hope for you, B! November 4, 2016 8:51 AM Log in to Reply Bart http://www.270towin.com/maps/Oe9dZ – how to achieve a tie Tuesday. Wouldn’t that be fitting for this election cycle, the race and associated verbal attacks would continue with Paul Ryan as kingmaker. November 4, 2016 8:50 AM Log in to Reply edatlanta I know you don’t really care if there’s an explanation but lumpting all medical research, psychology and economics together is not a terribly good strategy. And “a pharmaceutical company attempting to confirm the findings of 53 landmark cancer studies was successful in only six instances, a failure rate of 89pc” it not problematic. Have we already forgotten third-grade science? Experiments are supposed to test hypotheses, not to say X will happen 100% of the time. Anyway, what I’m trying to say is the obvious biases of the Spectator are misrepresenting what may be a legitimate problem. November 4, 2016 8:55 AM Log in to Reply Ginny It’s Zorg! http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/728578/Indian-MP-demands-Theresa-May-bends-her-knees-and-beg-forgiveness-and-demands-trillions November 4, 2016 10:05 AM Log in to Reply Dave Bearse Video of Jon Stewart telling the story of Trump initiating a Twitter war with him: https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalVideo/duplicates/5asf63/jon_stewart_twitter_war_with_donald_trump/ “I’m honored to have the greatest temperament that anyone’s ever had.” Trump, 03 Nov 2016 Concerns about Clinton are valid, but it’s remarks like that, after more than a half dozen Benghazi investigations, that undercut Trump sustaining any traction. November 4, 2016 10:40 AM Log in to Reply Noway2016 Who will be Trump’s AG? Guiliani! Secstate? Gingrich! Do both Hilly and Bill get indicted? Yep! And that is regardless of who’s elected. Does Obama pardon her? Hell no. It would be his only remembered legacy! November 4, 2016 10:42 PM Log in to Reply Sally Forth Charlie, ‘love the revamped website – kudos! November 6, 2016 1:45 PM Log in to Reply Add a Comment Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment.