On Dr. Seuss and Read Across America Week
Many folks who read this site probably know that I worked for 12 years in politics, but you may not know that time is bookended by teaching and librarianship. My first year out of college, I taught ninth grade English before going to work for a state rep over the summer that changed my career trajectory. After deciding to leave political work many years later, I went to graduate school to become an archivist, which means my masters degree is in library science. Between that last campaign and moving to North Carolina the next fall, I worked in a public library in Georgia, where I split my week between three departments, one of which was the children’s department. I come with that background to give some context to the “canceling of Dr. Seuss.”
After work yesterday, my mother, who watches Fox News throughout the day, asked me if I supported President Joe Biden and “liberal libraries” canceling Dr. Seuss on his birthday?
This was news to me, which, as someone active in the professional organizations, was surprising to say the least. So, I did what any good librarian would do and searched the topic on Twitter and Google to figure out what had happened. A perusal of the Blue Bird let me know that Fox mentioned Dr. Seuss’ cancellation 139 times between 4 AM and midnight yesterday, and a Google search found news articles and (many more) opinion pieces on the cancellation from the New York Post, Reason, and National Review. That was before you got to the pieces in mainstream media about this phenomena that most of us outside of the conservative news bubble had likely missed.
What I learned was two fold and not necessarily related: 1) Dr. Seuss Enterprises was going to stop publishing six books that contained insensitive portrayals of minority groups, and 2) President Biden’s Read Across America proclamation didn’t specifically name Dr. Seuss. Let’s start with the second point, and then tackle the first.
Read Across America Week was created by the National Education Association (NEA) in 1998 to celebrate reading, obviously. The first week of March was selected to coincide with Dr. Seuss’ birthday because his name is synonymous with early readers. However, NEA moved away from a Dr. Seuss-centric Read Across America two years ago to support a diverse readership.
From the article:
Our student populations are ever-changing and evolving and every year there are new children’s books that reflect that diversity. That’s why NEA’s Read Across America is rebranding with a new logo to appeal to students of all ages and backgrounds and a continued mission of “Celebrating a Nation of Diverse Readers.”
Of course, children still love Dr. Seuss, and his birthday on March 2, also Read Across America Day is still an ideal time for a school-wide reading event when you can serve green eggs and ham, but with the broadened scope of NEA’s Read Across America, there are activities, resources, and ideas to keep students reading all year long.
Whatever gets the kids to read — and there are so many good options now, which underscores NEA’s point. It’s not “canceling” Dr. Seuss as much as making room for other authors and their charming characters, too. Also, it’s letting the readers have choices to which they relate. This last part is so important, particularly when working with reluctant readers.
If you’ve not recently spent time in the children’s section of a library or bookstore, I highly encourage it. In a recent post, I mentioned how much I love Pigeon. There’s also the very cool Pete the Cat. Elephant and Piggy. Paddington. Mouse. Matilda. David. Clifford. Eva. Arthur. Juana and Lucas. Ramona. Amelia Bedelia. Corduroy. Curious George. Maisy. Peppa Pig. Madeline. The Berenstain Bears. This list is by no means exhaustive, and that’s mostly picture book characters only! Also, these aren’t all newer characters. I read books about Ramona and Curious George in the early 1980s.
It makes sense that President Biden would follow NEA’s direction to make this a broadly inclusive event. His proclamation was likely written at the organization’s request, so his staff was probably trying to tie in with the NEA’s current theme, as this is how many of the ceremonial proclamations are created. Also, given that NEA only recently pivoted away from a Dr. Seuss-centric event, it follows that Presidents Obama and Trump would have released proclamations celebrating the previous stated focus, which at the time was Dr. Seuss.
Long story short, this doesn’t seem to have any “there” there.
So, what of the “canceling” of the six books? Well, that’s being done by Dr. Seuss Enterprises, which controls the rights to Dr. Seuss’s dozens of books because the company realizes they contain material that doesn’t stand up well in today’s society. Yes, there was a study done to identify racist images in his books, and yes, it found particularly problematic images or statements in six out of the 60 books he wrote. Society changes over time. In this case, we’ve collectively become increasingly uncomfortable with racism, which has coincided with demographic shifts that also make us a more diverse population.
Dr. Seuss Enterprises is a for-profit company, and they’ve come to this conclusion not because of a pressure campaign by the left, but rather because of free market factors. I’ve not seen the six books slated for removal from the catalog on many (if any) reading lists in my time as a librarian. Perhaps readers are choosing other titles in the catalog — or titles by other authors — because that was the content they enjoyed and were comfortable reading. Perhaps Dr. Seuss Enterprises realizes that one of the major selling points for their brand is Dr. Seuss’s overwhelmingly positive image, something they have great interest in maintaining. It’s probably some of both. Given how often I’ve heard conservatives say “let the markets decide,” they can understand that this is exactly that.
I don’t find much “there” here, either.
What I do think is that this is a way to upset and scare people. As I noted above, society changes over time. Sure, changes can be scary, but reading is a skill I used as a child to help me make sense of change. I still read to learn, and as I become more informed, it helps me worry less. For this Read Across America Week, I hope you’ll pick up one of those diverse children’s books and meet some new friends that will make your world a broader place.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This is an excellent explanation. What’s funny is that I am someone who has read a lot and I mean a LOT of Dr. Seuss over the years, and of the books that will no longer be published, I’d only ever heard of “Mulberry Street.”
Pete The Cat, by the way, is Georgia Grown! Those books are great, the Pigeon books are a blast, as are Elephant and Piggie, basically the entire Kevin Henkes catalog, and the Olivia books are a riot. The Ramona books are terrific and really endure the decades, and also broach the topic of a family’s economic instability with empathy and nuance.
And the YA fiction that’s out there! Jacqueline Woodson, An Pham, Sharon Draper, Reina Telgemeier…
The bottom line is that reading makes us better humans, and our kids will not suffer one bit for the Seuss people ceasing publication of six books.
I went to an art showing that had some of Geisel’s pieces… tucked privately away in a corner.
Listen, that man had a dark side and some kink, which is fine. I trust men who are upfront about it a heckuva lot more than those who pretend they’re saints.
You said it correctly – they’re a for-profit organization reacting to the current market.
Everybody simmer down.
Found this article although it’s pretty mild.
“I attempted to draw the sexiest babes I could but they came out looking absurd.”
https://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/253891/
So sick already of how the buzzwordy but otherwise hollow use of ‘cancel culture’ is just being used by conservative media as a scarecrow and distraction. I get it- social conservatism implies that social culture should change little if at all. I mean, why update anything? Why evolve? Why try to understand change if we can just complain and use that change as the trigger to feed pellets of red meat to hungry viewers who will nevertheless be kept locked up in dark cages?
Cancel culture antipathy won’t even permit large amounts of people using their voices, platforms, and spending patterns- virtually every expression of their 1st Amendment rights- to challenge the status quo or be the stimulus for evolution. No one can cancel the culture’s past, but to say we have no responsibility to understand it, or the present, or the future? Social conservatism’s views on personal responsibility have in many ways seemed to be replaced by blind rejection of any evolution, at any cost. Where is the thoughtful debate? Where is a version of what could be conservative progress? Sticking heads in sands and yelling loudly is not conservative- it’s regressive and dangerously blind. Please help conservative media evolve, and put forth some sort of responsible analysis and positive vision.
“they came for Mr. Potato head. Now they’re coming for Dr. Seuss.”
Here’s Roy Edroso chopping up Erick Erickson: http://alicublog.blogspot.com/2021/03/live-from-rick-perrys-ranch.html
First good article, I believe balanced, factual, and well written.
BUT!. As a conservative am I concerned about “canceling Dr. Seuss.” No. he was not canceled by Biden or the NEA. The NEA is changing their direction and they are perfectly free to do so. Biden only followed the direction the NEA was moving. The END.
Next, “Let the markets decide.” Dr. Seuss Enterprises is a for-profit company, and they’ve come to this conclusion not because of a pressure campaign by the left, but rather because of free market factors.” Now wait a second isn’t the “left” part of that market? They believe they are and as a testament they launch campaigns all the time to boycott certain businesses to force their views the business and everyone else. Remember Chick-Fil-A and recently My Pillow? Is that “Free Market”. Actually yes it is if you believe the “left” is part of the free market. As soon as I take my head off My Pillow I’ll be happy to see some of you at Chick-Fil-A for lunch. Others not so much.
Is this decision by Dr. Seuss Enterprises a sound business decision? Well, if I could predict market trends I would be a very rich man indeed. So maybe it is and maybe it isn’t but I do know this, the advertising Dr. Seuss Enterprises is losing through the NEA’s decision will likely have a negative business revenue impact. Just saying.
“Society changes over time.” Indeed it does and you can follow that back for thousands of years. During the Roman Empire era it was common practice to destroy statues and public painting of politicians and popular people who fall out of favor. Where did it get them? Forgive me when I laugh about the radicals destroying statues of U.S. Grant and taking Lincoln’s name off schools. I can only think George Santayana who said “Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it” status as a philosopher might need to be upgraded to prophet.