Morning Reads – Thursday, December 19, 2019

Oh the irony. It’s the anniversary (21 years) of when President Bill Clinton was impeached on two charges of perjury and obstruction of justice by the U.S. House of Representatives.

Peaches

Jimmy Carter

Sweet Tea

13
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
5 Comment threads
8 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
bethebalancealpha maleDave Bearsexdog Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
xdog
xdog

Second the approval of the DDS firings and the dumping of the “Puerto Rican Interview Guide”. Caban Gonzalez deserves some nice change when his suit is settled. At least he can expect to get his SS card back.

Dave Bearse
Dave Bearse

The GOP claims the impeachment process has been a rushed along sham. Perhaps it’s time to let the articles remain in the House until the courts weigh in on various cases before them that would affect Senate proceedings.

alpha male
alpha male

Most striking fact in this whole charade is that you and your ilk do not even realize how hilarious this gambit of yours is.

bethebalance
bethebalance

^Meaningless comment.

alpha male
alpha male

I think you meant to say “ meaningless impeachment’. Apparently not even worth prosecuting.

bethebalance
bethebalance

No, I called it meaningless because it had no substance-i.e. no reference or incorporation of any fact or policy. Just an emotional dig, with an over-generalization of people for bad measure. At least in this most recent comment you raise an argument which incorporates a present state of fact. But I personally couldn’t tell you if the Articles will be passed to Senate or not, or whether it even matters at this point. But I do think that everybody- all Reps- took this procedure very seriously, and with gravamen, and just blowing it off as a joke is just a… Read more »

alpha male
alpha male

Ridiculous comment. But typical.

bethebalance
bethebalance

Ppl are always telling me how silly I am.

Dave Bearse
Dave Bearse

Upholding Constitutional responsibility is funny to you. Is that because you forgot to laugh when national Republicans made fiscal conservatism a joke?

Dave Bearse
Dave Bearse

Anyone else notice Trump lashing Rep Dingell because didn’t produce the quid pro quo for deigning to give her husband, the longest serving member of Congress ever, government respect when he died?

It’s not a pattern. It’s coincidence as every Republican will tell you. There’s no documentation that a favor was expected, and you can’t know with absolute certainty what Trump was thinking while publicly questioning whether he husband was in hell for it to Republican cheers.

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2019/12/18/trump-targets-dingell-late-husband-during-battle-creek-rally/2692307001/

It’s worth noting that sycophants like Doug Collins refer to Trump as a gentleman.

Dave Bearse
Dave Bearse

Two-thirds of the letter’s 27 paragraph have annotations, but Trump fully covered the bases by averaging 1.5 annotations in the 18 paragraphs with annotations.

Stable genius Trump thinks he’s channeling Alan Dershowitz. And who will say different to him. Certainly no Trump supporters and virtually no elected Republicans at any level or those beholden to the party.