Perdue, Abrams, and the Federal Debt Concern in Georgia

  • Senator David Perdue and Republican members of the Georgia congressional delegation are sounding the alarm about the federal debt, despite a muted response at present from most in Washington.
  • The University of Georgia, Selig Center for Economic Growth lists large federal deficits as a leading threat to Georgia’s economy.

Only a rare few are talking about the national debt right now. It’s sort of spooky how silent federal lawmakers are on the subject that dominated the news for the last decade. The national debt wasn’t mentioned in either President Trump’s State of the Union or in the official Democratic response given by Stacey Abrams, who is expected to run for Senate in 2020. But while Abrams skipped on a debt discussion, Abrams’s would-be competitor Senator David Perdue (R-Ga) is ramping up to cast himself as a “deficit hawk.” On Tuesday, Senator Perdue announced a resolution calling for the national debt to be labeled a national security threat. Senator Perdue will also speak at CPAC Saturday on a two-person panel titled Deficit Hawks: An Endangered Species? Tackle the Debt Before it Tackles You.

And the resolution is not the first time this year members of Georgia’s congressional delegation have expressed concern about the rising national debt, which currently totals over $22 trillion, and federal budget deficits, which is estimated to be $900 billion in 2019. On January 30th, 2019, Congressman Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga) re-introduced a joint resolution calling for a balanced budget amendment, a sweeping measure to rein in deficits, in the House of Representatives which is co-sponsored by Jody Hice (R-Ga) and Doug Collins (R-Ga). Senator Perdue and the Georgia delegations’ posturing comes as national attention might soon return to the national debt. A congressional debate on the debt could occur as a vote on whether to increase the debt ceiling again at the end of the summer coincides with a new budget deal that must be reached by the end of September. Politicians who have been silent on the debt might then appear obtuse and caught off guard as the national debate looms.

And the continued large federal deficits can have major ramifications on the peach state’s economy. According to the University of Georgia, Selig Center for Economic Growth (Selig Center), the federal debt and the accompanying spending restructuring is a primary factor that could hamper future economic upswings. The Selig Center zeroes in on two government financing areas at risk for restructurings, federal employment and transfer payments, like Social Security and Medicaid. Required changes to both or either federal spending area could be particularly impactful in Georgia cities like Macon and Albany.

Transfer payments make up a gigantic percentage of consumer buying power in Georgia. The Selig Center estimates transfer payments comprise over 17.4% of personal income in Georgia, following the national average, and include retirement, Social Security, disability insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment insurance, food stamps, military medical insurance, and veterans’ benefits. And transfer payments significantly exceed the state average in cities like Albany, Rome, and Macon. The Selig Center states that despite these programs improving the economy, an aging of the population “assures that these sums will continue to rise, which has implications for government finances at all levels.” Further, the Selig Center asserts uncertainty about federal funding for mandated programs, especially Medicaid, is the biggest challenge for state governments. The Selig Center report states “mandatory spending on Medicaid is crowding out spending on education (K-12 through college) and infrastructure, areas essential to boosting Georgia’s competitiveness, productivity, and culture for innovation.”

Federal employment is significant in Georgia, supplying a larger percentage of jobs and earnings than the national average. Per the Selig Center, federal employment provides 3.2% of nonfarm jobs and 5.4% of nonfarm earnings in Georgia, outpacing the national average of 2.6% of nonfarm jobs and 4.1% of nonfarm earnings. In cities like Macon and Augusta, the leading high wage industry is federal employment. In Albany, Marine Corps Logistics Base is the area’s top employer. Locations with major military bases make up huge amounts of their earnings from the federal government (e.g., Brunswick, Augusta, Valdosta, Columbus, Warner Robins, and Hinesville). The Selig Center expects military spending and the number of military personals to increase, due in part to rising international tensions, over the short term. However, the Selig Center is less optimistic about federal civilian employees working for agencies besides the Department of Defense (DoD). Selig Center projects non-DoD federal employees’ encompass 57% of federal civilian employment in Georgia and will probably drop in the coming years.

However, the Selig Center found not all areas of Georgia as impacted by federal debt. Atlanta is particularly immune to public-sector restructuring partially because the only large federal employer in the Atlanta area is the Center for Disease and Control, which employs 9,200 individuals. Additionally, the federal earnings from jobs in the Atlanta area are below both the national and state averages for nonfarm jobs. Athens is another Selig Center example of a city with relatively little federal employment.

8
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
6 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
bethebalanceDave BearseLTWillxdogGregs Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Jack Fitz
Jack Fitz

This gaggle of spenders (sorry, revenue cutters) clamoring about the debt or deficit is akin to bootleggers loading up the collection plates at churches during prohibition.

Benevolus
Benevolus

Say the words Sen. Perdue: Trickle. Down. Doesn’t. Work.

Ellynn
Ellynn

I don’t find it spooky at all the folks who sent a decade talking the debt stopped talking about the debt. When the GOP holds the presidency and the house, they control the budget and as shown in 2001-2006, the debt was not an issue… cus you know WAR!. Then when they Dems control the House or the Presidency…. WE NEED TO STOP SENDING TO LOWER THE DEBT! This is how the we end up with GOP sponsored bills that the DEM president will sign cutting everything across the budget the same percent. Then we get a GOP House AND… Read more »

xdog
xdog

I thought the use of spooky was ironic. We all know gopers will go back to lamenting the national debt the very same moment they start worrying again about the imperial presidency, shortly after a donk is back in charge.

Gregs
Gregs

If Perdue really believed what he is saying why didn’t he insist on spending cuts to offset the massive tax cuts? Why did he vote for an increase in military spending without identifying the corresponding cuts to offset it?

We all know why. He believes in nothing.

bethebalance
bethebalance

More than not insisting, as part of the tax bill, he voted to waive “Pay As You Go” (Pay-Go) requirements, which would have required the offsets to prevent any increase to the deficit.
Ironically? it’s been Pelosi et al. that have restored Pay-Go rules to the House, even over objections from other Dems.
In total, it’s as if the public narrative on “fiscal conservatism” does not match up to recent actions at all.

LTWill
LTWill

It’s impossible to take him seriously when his public pronouncements don’t match his voting history.

Dave Bearse
Dave Bearse

It’s Trump’s party and Trump standards apply. Trump is a serial liar, and David Perdue is a Trumper.

Why even worry about deficit spending when Trump said he’d pay off the entire national debt in eight years?