Campaigns And Hurricanes

This week’s Courier Herald column:

It was Monday September 10th and Florence already had my attention. Much of social media was already populated with remembrances of September 11th, calling September 10th the last day we would know as normal. It was a fitting juxtaposition for the forecast. Despite still being almost a week away, the National Hurricane Center had an amazingly tight cone that projected the direction of Florence. The southeast corner of North Carolina was in the bullseye. A few days of normal for them were left.

For most it’s just another news story or weather event. For me and my family, this one is personal. My mother was born in Richlands, a tiny town on the outskirts of Jacksonville NC and Camp Lejeune. Our relatives are scattered along the coastal counties from Wilmington to New Bern.

Some live in coastal towns such as Wrightsville Beach or Emerald Isle. Many others have more inland addresses, but are still subject to flooding in an area that contains as much swampland and river bottom as it does piedmont plateaus. Hurricane Floyd showed us what a decent tropical storm could bring when it flooded most of the region in 1999. I recall one visit months after when the possessions of most households along highways 41 and 53 had their former earthly belongings piled along the roadside, still waiting for someone to eventually make them disappear.

Last week was all about the anticipation of the storm. For those in harm’s way, there are decisions to be made. How should property be secured, and when and where to evacuate are chief among them. It’s easy for those of us not in an evacuation zone to make these decisions. It’s much harder still for those to decide to leave. For some, it’s even a question of how. For the elderly, the evacuation can often be more dangerous than staying put.

The problem is exacerbated by some members of the media who over hype the storm. For too many, it’s performance art. This was a storm that didn’t need the hype. It was a category 3 or 4 for much of its travels across the Atlantic. Thankfully, it slowed on its approach and the wind speed diminished before coming ashore. The damage, for much of the area due to flooding, will certainly still be catastrophic.

But still, the reporter for The Weather Channel needs to be singled out for his theatrics of pretending to be almost blown down by the wind when others casually strolled behind him during his live shot. There’s a lesson here between the hype of what’s about to happen and covering the actual news once it has occurred.

When Hurricane Andrew hit south Florida in 1992, the reporters left almost as soon as the clouds broke. They had covered the immediate impact. They missed the story. There was devastation for miles inland. It went well beyond the standard pictures of twisted metal and boats run aground that have become cliché for storm coverage. This, however, is the public’s attention span for such news. Anticipation can be hyped. Real and complex problems that can’t be solved in a 90 second hit on the 6pm news quickly become dull, regardless of the struggle the problems represent.

As this is a campaign year, and this usually a political column, a certain parallel can be made. Our media enjoys covering campaigns much like hurricanes. An era of soundbite and click bait journalism has left us with journalists that will spend two or more years covering the horse race of a campaign, without ever scratching below the surface of policy differences or actual governance issues between candidates.

When the election is over, there’s brief coverage of the coronation, then many turn their attention to the next election. If only the attention of the journalists – and the public – could be inverted to spend a few weeks on campaigns and the balance of the years in between on the routine functions and decisions made in governance.

It’s hard to blame the journalists. The public readily understands the horse race without much additional data, much as the public can relate to the weatherman standing in the windy rain without over processing what’s really going on in the background.

The storms entertain us. Cleaning up the damage left behind is too much like work.

North Carolina will require a lot of work. So will implementing the policies on which the candidates are currently campaigning.

Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
MattMD_actualarmanidogScottNAtlanta Recent comment authors
newest oldest
Notify of

I’m sorry for your family’s loss, hopefully only material things that can be replaced. This first came on my radar Sept. 2nd (I’m a big weather nerd). Its times like these that I wish the NHC would develop a better rating system for hurricanes. People think the Saffir-Simpson scale denotes a hurricanes power. It does not. It only goes by wind speed, and in the case of Florence, I think it gave people a sense that it would not be as bad when that was not the case at all. Florence was a LARGE storm, and those types of storms… Read more »


Flooding sucks. Especially in the south with this heat wave we have now. As far as news goes, one has to search for in-depth news analysis and good writing. For my daily news I look at Reuters because it is simple and fairly brief. I also look at the BBC’s North America coverage since they are fairly neutral about US politics. And they have some good in-depth articles. Occasionally I watch PBS News Hour on YouTube since it is neutral and has some depth to their stories. And the above websites are free and I don’t need cable/satellite TV to… Read more »


I must say that I have had plenty of normal days since September 11th. That was a tragic, even horrific, day but I think it is important to keep perspective. Of course I wasn’t directly impacted by the attacks but I believe life always has a way of going on.

Lives cannot be replaced but things can be rebuilt.