Are School Bus Camera Bill Critics Arguing About Safety or Money?

One of the major themes of this year’s legislative session was one of driver safety.  After decades of decreasing fatality rates on the roads, the number of Georgians killed per miles driven has been rising for the past few years.  While cars have been designed with increasing safety features, drivers have themselves been becoming more dangerous to themselves and others.

The key bill this session was from Rep John Carson which bans the hand held use of cell phones while driving.  Another bill, HB 978, addresses the use of cameras on school busses for motorists who pass them, and for speeding in school zones.  This bill, as they say, is “for the children”.

There’s been a late push to get the Governor to veto the latter bill.  The official “controversy” is that some are now claiming language changes the definition of where motorists must stop on multi-lane highways.  It appears a few school districts have created their own interpretation of the law that is contrary to the Office of Legislative Counsel.

So why would some local districts be trying to kill a bill at the eleventh hour that provides greater tools to combat speeders in school zones and those passing school buses picking up or dropping off kids?  Because the bill correctly redirects the fines collected to local law enforcement, not to the local school boards.

When the original bill authorizing school bus cameras in Georgia was passed, it was the local school systems that were designated to receive the fines.  That’s not how public safety works.

Schools are funded to educate our kids.  Funds used for public safety are under the purview of law enforcement.  HB 978 makes this correction.

In the event that additional legal or court opinions contradict Legislative Counsel, there can always be a technical correction to HB 978 at a later date.  That’s how our system with a part time legislature is designed to work.

Instead, some who are trusted with the education, care, and safety of Georgia’s children are advocating that a bill designed to make their schools and roads that lead that lead to them more safe should be vetoed over a quibble in language that would affect only a small portion of pick-ups and drop-offs, and then only if Legislative Counsel is wrong.  It’s really hard to understand that…until you see the money trail behind the criticism.

 

3
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
FreeDuckBenevolusTDubs Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
TDubs
TDubs

Sure local school systems are all looking for additional revenue and everyone knows that once a flow is established it isn’t ever going to get redirected.

The recent dispute in Cobb over the stop arm tickets highlighted questions over the fines being for civil violations and the agreed upon split.

Perhaps the question should be who at the state legislature drafted the attempt to redirect the revenue stream already established instead of allowing the local jurisdictions to continue.

Benevolus
Benevolus

I’m confused. Is there a current law that directs this money to school districts? Is that what is being changed? If so, then school systems have been planning on this revenue and if it disappears is there replacement funding?

FreeDuck
FreeDuck

School districts bought and installed the cameras on their buses and they get some portion of the money collected by a third party private company that mails pseudo citations to people it catches on its cameras. I imagine that directing the revenue to local law enforcement complicates that somewhat. Personally I think it’s a needed correction to what is effectively a revenue generating scheme.