No, Georgia Isn’t Florida or Tennessee

This week’s Courier Herald column. You can view the first part of this series here.

Last week we began a review of Georgia’s income tax. It appears there is a bidding war breaking out among GOP candidates for Governor as to who can cut the income tax the most. We’re continuing to look at the issue this week, in hopes to help you distinguish between realistic fiscal goals and the folly of empty campaign rhetoric.

Georgia’s income tax rate is 6%. Our neighbor North Carolina has recently cut their top rate to 5.49%. Other neighboring states Tennessee and Florida have no state income tax.

North Carolina is the state most similar to Georgia. It’s population is within a rounding error’s difference. It’s demographic makeup is also about the same. The major difference between the states is that they have Charlotte and a relatively dispersed population. We concentrate half of all Georgians in metro Atlanta. The folks at the Department of Economic Development will also tell you that they’re usually our closest competitor for targeted prospects.

While North Carolina’s structure deserves closer inspection, the empty rhetoric part of this debate starts at “Tennessee and Florida don’t have a state income tax, so why should we?”. There’s a couple of reasons.

There are more taxes that go into making a state competitive than income taxes. There are also property taxes, sales taxes, and numerous other fees and tolls that fill state coffers.

Georgia’s current system is heavily based on the income tax. This isn’t because Georgians got up one morning and said “Hey, let’s pick the highest income tax rate in the southeast”. It’s actually because over time, Georgia’s legislature has cut other taxes – some significantly.

Georgia is now largely out of the property tax business. Local goverments still tax property, but the state portion of ad valorem taxes – incluing the tax on cars – is all but gone.

Similarly, Georgia does not tax groceries as part of the sales tax mix. That’s a significant portion of a household’s spending that evades the tax man, especially for lower income households.

So for every Georgian that is musing that they wish they could be like Tenneseee on income tax, there’s probably a Floridian wishing they could have Georgia’s property tax structure, or a Tenneeseean wanting to know why they have to pay taxes on groceries to feed their family when Georgia families don’t have to.

When looking at competitiveness between states – remembering that the chief argument to lower or eliminate the income tax is on this basis – the total tax burden must be compared. Competitiveness is more than just one tax rate.

When looking at the total tax burden for each southeastern state, Georgia is next to last in terms of taxation and spending per person as of 2015. Only Florida is lower than Georgia, and Florida is different in ways that Georgia will not match any time soon.

Florida’s economy is built around tourism. They have an almost unlimited, heavily developed coastline that draws summer tourists and winter snowbirds alike. Many of these folks declare residency but don’t use services year round, thus decreasing the per capita burden they impose on the state.

Florida’s population also skews older, which means significantly lower education spending than other southeastern states. Georgia, you should know, spends more than half of its budget on education.

When looking at the remaining southeastern states, Georgia stands tall. In FY 2015, Georgia’s total expenditures per person came to $4,302. That covers education, transportation, public safety, Medicaid, and a host of other services provided by the state. Tennesee spent $4,688 per person that same year, or 9% more per person to deliver the same services. The big spender in the southeast is Arkansas, spending 78% more per person than Georgia.

Our closest competitor, North Carolina? They are also closest in state spending, with just a 2% higher spending rate in 2015.

The takeaway here is that Georgia’s spending isn’t out of control, nor is it out of line. More importantly, any tax cut must be made up the exact same year with a spending cut as Georgia must balance its budget every year.

Thus, anyone promoting a plan to eliminate Georgia’s income tax must come up with service cuts or replacement taxes to pay for them. Given that Georgia is currently spending less per person than our neighboring states, the likelihood would be that cuts in income taxes will come from other new taxes, which is more of a form of window dressing than it is in substantive “cuts”.

2
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
SaltycrackerJwschull01 Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jwschull01
Jwschull01

Or alternatively, seek a new, more lucrative form of tax income. Cannabis would be a winner, all around. Recreational, medical and construction, with recreational being the best sin tax. At least for a couple years until the other deep red southern states catch on.

Saltycracker
Saltycracker

A “cut taxes” vs. “don’t cut” is the easy deversion to the real problem of cleaning up the system. The politicians, lawyers, lobbyists and committee junkies serve themselves best via obfuscation. Consider: Corporate tax, dump it and many of the bureaucratic agencies spending it. There are still plenty of other business revenue sources in play. Sales tax, apply it across the board, food, internet… Personal income tax, eliminate schedule A, Set both sales tax and income at lower rates but one that that would produce more revenue after cost reductions. Give public workers under say $72k a pay increase by… Read more »