April 4, 2017 6:00 AM
Morning Reads for Tuesday, April 4
Good morning! Are you ready to transition from college basketball to major league baseball and golf?
- Five Georgia companies want a piece of Trump’s wall.
- Here’s an overview of the massive tax breaks given to Georgia companies, often by unelected boards.
- This week, Atlanta is home to an impressionist battle royale.
- The ED of the 21st Century Partnership in Warner Robins resigned.
- Cobb County is making it easier to process open records requests.
- Lousy records and poor data on school bus maintenance is potentially endangering many Georgia children.
- Restoring passenger rail service along the Gulf Coast is increasingly unlikely.
- This handy graphic cuts through the smoke obfuscating the White House’s ties to Russia.
- Trump donated his first paycheck to the National Park Service.
- He also shook hands with Egypt’s authoritarian leader during White House visit, saying that President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, who was barred from the White House for the past four years, is doing a “fantastic job.”
- “Amélie” opened on Broadway this week. “It is pleasant to look at, easy to listen to and oddly recessive.”
- A friend of mine said it best: “Not all heroes wear capes.”
- Have you listened to the S*Town podcast? If you have, please share your thoughts or theories in the comments. It’s captivating and if you haven’t listened, it’s worth your while.
48 Comments
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Broken link on “Amélie”…the original movie with Audrey Tautou is really cute. Haven’t seen it in years.
It should be fixed!
Keeping current that graphic of Team Trump and Team Putin would be a full-time job. Witness yesterday’s news about Erik Prince and the Seychelles.
I guess I’m the last one to learn that Prince is Betsy DeVos’ brother.
I e-mailed someone at GDOT the following. It may not merit implementation, but am including it here that it receive for a wider audience in event that it does.
“The flyover from eastbound I-285 to northbound I-85 was often congested outside of peak periods prior to the I-85 viaduct collapse. Since I-85 closure is significantly increasing traffic using the flyover, I suggest that GDOT consider implementing the following measure:
Close the northbound I-85 right lane at Moreland Interchange from north of the exit to Northcrest Road north to the I-85 eastbound to I-285 northbound on-ramp, and allow two lane movement from the flyover to northbound I-85. Northbound I-85 traffic at Moreland Interchange is no doubt more since the I-85 closure. Eliminating the present two lane to one lane merge at the end of the I-85 eastbound to I-285 northbound flyover would reduce flyover congestion, a circumstance that tended to clog the flyover in off peak hours even before the I-85 viaduct collapse, and congestion that often extends back onto eastbound I-285.
It would of course be necessary to provide a break in the I-85 northbound right lane closure for I-285 westbound (northbound) to I-85 north on-ramp traffic. I think the distances from the Northcrest Road off-ramp to the I-285 westbound to I-85 northbound on-ramp, and from that on-ramp to the I-285 eastbound to I-85 northbound (now two lanes) on-ramp are sufficient for tapered right lane closure. Since I-85 will be closed at the viaduct for months, I-85 north could be temporarily restriped to close the right lane as described above. Alternately restriping could occur after implementation is determined to be worthy of a try and implementation is found to be effective.”
I think a diagram would get that point across much better than words alone…I got a headache just trying to sort out what you were saying. Make a diagram, and share it on some photo sharing site like imgur.com and post a link
Dave interposed 85 and 285 in this sentence: ” I-85 eastbound to I-285 northbound on-ramp” so that probably adds to your confusion.
Of course that interchange is complicated and I agree with your solution as a stopgap since 85N rarely backs up below the perimeter I doubt losing a lane would be an issue. There are other issues that exacerbate the traffic on the flyover during backups including people taking the 85S exit from 285E and crossing over 3 lanes to exit on the 85N ramp provided for the vehicles entering from Buford Hwy. that merges halfway up the flyover. Also 285W traffic that take the Northcrest exit and crossover to merge with the flyover traffic to 85N before it becomes exit only to Northcrest. This is especially popular with some 18 wheelers who like its tamer curve to the 285W to 85N ramps. The problem is in high traffic times they have to use big guy privilege in their merging thus exacerbating the flyover traffic even more.
Depends on who you ask. Will you like it? No. Will the Freedom Caucus and Tuesday group love it? No, but hopefully they understand now that they can like it as a first step. There are things that they can pass outside of a full repeal that gives the Secretary of HHS a broader ability to do certain things administratively with waivers and other items. We will see what comes out today, but there is a chance something passes by the end of the week.
Not sure what the name will be, but I’d assume it’s the AHCA with major tweaks. It will need to pass the full house by Friday. I don’t believe it eliminates EHBs. It allows states to determine what meets those benefits and or ask for a waiver to the EHB if they can show they have a better way to provide coverage that meets those needs. Again, I know you won’t like that, but there are senators that could live with that.
Any thoughts on this article from either of you?
https://www.axios.com/gop-leaders-worried-about-trumpcare-and-pre-existing-conditions-2344213563.html
I think that this article clearly shows why passing a major piece of legislation isn’t as easy as some people out in the everyday world would think. Guaranteed issue/community rating is a very serious topic for many people, on both sides of the argument. I would also say that Andrew and other Democrats would not necessarily dispute the fact that guaranteed issue/community rating has increased insurance cost for many people because that was the point. Make people who can pay more pay for those that can’t.
The problem that I and many on my side of the argument that have with community rating and guaranteed issue is that is does what it’s designed to do to well. Drive up costs. What we would prefer is to drive down costs for everyone so that someone with a major diagnoses isn’t priced out of the insurance market place. It you can make it cheaper to care for that person it is then cheaper to insure them. I do however believe there are many in Congress who are short sighted and think that simply by doing away with community rating the problem goes away. It won’t. It will simply put us where we were in 2007.
There has to be something to fill that void and there has to be a transition time during that void where both community rating and guaranteed issue have to stay for a short time. If you do away with them and costs have not come down you are screwing people. If you leave it you are screwing people who are younger or do not have major health issues.
Again, the solution is to start driving down costs of providing health care (pharmaceuticals, medical devices, primary care, long term care, deliver systems, durable medical equipment…everything.) You do that by stop taxing the shit out of all of it. Yes we need taxes, but the 2% of gross on medical devices is craziness. Someone has to pay for that. It’s me and you and your grandmother that needs a new heart value or knee.
Next you address the burdensome regulations that have been put in place. This could be a post all on it’s own, but there are hundreds of thousands of regulations that do nothing to help a patient or drive down costs. Those need to be gone through with a fine tooth comb and repealed. Most of that luckily can be done administratively at HHS.
I’ve got to run. I’ll post more later if I can.
See, the two of you can have concise and opposing opinions – plus be informative.
Thanks for the input gentleman.
I will admit that I am full of snark, but do try to be as informative as I can most of the time.
This coming from the guy who’s team governed so well that they lost to Donald Trump………..
So, by your logic, they want to take a law that roughly 50% of the country is happy with or would like to see fixed and replace it with something roughly NOBODY likes…somehow that doesnt equate with good governance. It sounds more like a load of crap (as you like to say so often)
It’s hard for people to know what is in the bill when members of Congress are sometimes too dumb to talk coherently on the topic. Of course people are scared of the changes in the ACA. The republicans have done a terrible job of selling it because they prefer to fight themselves. I will eagerly agree that many of the members of the freedom caucus are full of crap.
Whoa, Nellie!!! That be a felony!!
http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/03/susan-rice-ordered-spy-agencies-to-produce-detailed-spreadsheets-involving-trump/
Hillary/Rice for Prison 2017!!
Whatta ya think? Matching prison garb? Bunk mates?
Whoa Nellie is right. The request to unmask the names is not illegal. If it were, the request would have been denied. It is only a felony for Rice if the names were then leaked by Rice. Do you have evidence that Rice leaked the information? Or that Rice conspired to have the names unmasked so that they could be leaked? That is a problem with a lot of the partisan – whether left wing or right wing – media reports. They go straight from A to C – or even A to F – while skipping over the intermediate steps. In this case we have A) Rice requested the information and C) the information was leaked (based on my presumption of your calling for jail time) but that leaves B) did Rice leak the information OR collaborate with the leakers to be dealt with.
OK, so someone with no credibility (the pizzagate guy) runs a story he says he got from Bloomberg because they wouldn’t run it, then when Bloomberg does run it they say it’s all likely legal. Then another outlet with no credibility goes to a former US attorney with no credibility who claims a bunch of new info even though he hasn’t been in the government since about 1988.
Sounds legit.
With apologies to Lt. Col. Bill Kilgore (Robert Duvall), “I love the smell of subpoenas in the morning. It smells like…victory!” The question is, fellas, is whether or not she takes The Fifth. And I ain’t talking Jim Beam. Lord, this is good! Just desserts for a proven liar.
This be abusive use of government resources on your political opponents. It’s one thing for ‘ol Noway, as a private investigator, to do Opposition Research on Senator Snort. (Don’t you just love “Grin and Bear It?”) It’s quite another and quite chilling, actually, for Uncle Sam to be doing it!
Paging Jeff Sessions…
Fake News Roasting on a Dumpster Fire.
Pizzagate purveyor stirs another empty pot.
https://mediamatters.org/video/2017/04/04/susan-rice-denies-right-wing-media-lies-meant-bolster-trump-s-wiretap-nonsense/215910
Rebuttal Interview transcript
LOLOLOL! David Brock?! Do you people have trouble sleeping at night? It must be exhausting trying to do anything, defend any-damn-illegal behaviors to protect Hilly, Barry and Susan. I’m genuinely worried for yall’s health.
I see a lot of Fake fighting Fake in these links. I’m LOLing too.
And, and, and, and…I love CNN’s frantic, hysterical, screeching proclamations that THEYYYYYY will not even cover this story!!!!
So Trump friend, confidante, and former staffer Roger Stone admitted to being in touch with guccifer (Russian) and wikileaks, and specifically predicted the release of Podesta emails, and you don’t think it’s appropriate for the NSA to be looking into any and all communications that might be related to that, especially given that we were also parrying Russian cyber-infiltrators at the same time?
I’m going to be disappointed if we find out that Susan Rice wasn’t looking at that stuff, and anything connected to Michael Flynn as well.
More follow up on a rare good oped from Kyle Wingfield. Metro Atlanta needs several new highways for both capacity and redundancy … and to divert passerby truckers and tourists (those ideally would be toll lanes) far away from I-285.
http://kylewingfield.blog.myajc.com/2017/04/04/opinion-i-85-collapse-should-get-attention-of-candidates-voters/
The only opposition to this could come from:
A) people who wish to force others out of their cars against their wills
B) people who simply do not wish to spend any money on anything.
Before anyone engages in revisionist history…you should watch this short documentary about the real fight over those north south freeways
Scott, interesting piece in Inman Park—-John Lewis’ stance against the parkway doubtless helped in his 52-48% win over Julian Bond in the 1986 5th CD runoff…I suspect a lot of folks saw the Presidential Parkway (Freedom Parkway) as a “Trojan horse” to bui;ld the Stone Mtn Freeway—I mean, the parkway would have been about a third the length of the proposed SM Freeway, so heck, if you finish the first third, you may as well finish the remaining two-thirds. No one was fooled by the story that Carter’s library would have so much traffic, we needed a parkway for that reason.
When you ram an interstate through a walkable neighborhood in northeast Atlanta, you are imposing a car centric lifestyle on people who don’t want it.
Not only do we not have the interstate infrastructure for free and easy commutes from some exurb, we also lack the arterial road infrastructure to get cars to their destinations. It’s far far far too late to fix that though. It’s much easier to live closer to where you work.
And can afford intown housing, are DINKs, or Pace Academy if not, etc. Everything is easier with money.
It is easy today to criticize those who “did not know better” 60 and 70 years ago designing Atlanta’s expressway system—but who then would have figured today we would have some 6 million in the general area? Furthermore, Atlanta started its expressway system before the 1956 passage of the Interstate act—for instance, the first stretch of the system opened in the fall of 1951, between Williams Street near the EY Tower and Brookwood; by 1955 or so, the Northeast Expressway was completed to Lenox Road, and construction of the Northwest Expressway (from Brookwood to West Paces Ferry) was well underway. Certainly the planners did not know in the 1940s that there would be an interstate system, but even if that had, for cost reasons—and the disruption of neighborhoods—it is unlikely they would have planned on 2 north-south freeways through the city. Heck, it took about 5 years (1959-1964) just to finish the Downtown Connector from Courtland Street to about today’s Turner Field—a distance of perhaps 3 miles at most. The amount of right of way acquisition, relocation of utilities and extensive bridge construction must have been enormous. Building I-20 through the city was very difficult, as you might surmise traveling the narrow right of way below Atlanta University. The extension of 400 into Buckhead in 1993 was the last limited-access highway built into the city—and likely the last one ever built.
Beyond 285, it gets difficult because development has spread so far out—building a Northern Arc today would mean plowing through a lot of neighborhoods in Cherokee and Forsyth. Good luck with that. The idea making the most sense would be a western by-pass of 75, from perhaps near Macon to near Cartersville and divert a lot of the Florida to and from traffic out of intown freeways and 285. It might require tolls to finance, which I have no problem with—and so that it does its job (a through route), minimize the number of exits, not one every mile or so like you see on 285.
As for interstates connecting other Georgia cities, the question is whether there would be enough traffic to justify that. The state has spent a lot of money building non-interstate four-lane highways connecting, as examples, Columbus and Macon, Albany to I-75. DOT did a study years ago on extending 185 below Columbus but found the traffic volumes did not justify it—already a lot of four-lane highways below Columbus, and you don’t hear often about traffic jams on those highways.
With regard to truck traffic, intermodal (putting trailers and containers on trains) is most effective over long distances—not so much over shorter ones—but perhaps see what we can do there. Georgia Ports Authority for instance has been working on increasing use of rail at the port to cut down on the enormous truck traffic there. Rail won’t replace the need for road improvements, but still could be of some help.
“Beyond 285, it gets difficult because development has spread so far out—building a Northern Arc today would mean plowing through a lot of neighborhoods in Cherokee and Forsyth. Good luck with that.”
Adds a third item to
“The only opposition to this could come from:
A) people who wish to force others out of their cars against their wills
B) people who simply do not wish to spend any money on anything.”
GDOT and C.W. Matthews have announced a surprising (at least to me) reopening date of June 15 for I-85:
http://www.myajc.com/news/breaking-reopen-june-officials-say/fQcpIeQxcrptK4jarOZSqM
It’s going to depend on how quickly they can manufacture the precast spans. That type of cast take weeks to cure before they can release the structural tense cables. You need to find a pre-caster (maybe even 2-4) that has either room in their schedule or can push back their current orders of summer construction – AND they need to be on an accessible route for 250′ spans that will ride higher then typical overpass clearances.
So do they just pull out the design folder for 250′ pre-cast beams with xx load factor, or do they have to design a new one?
They can use the existing design from when it was built if it meets the evaluation standard under the current set of codes – updated for load, wind, and seismic design – if absolutely necessary, or they can get the federal to grandfather in the prior design if it has no fatal design issue, like they did for the off ramp in LA after a tanker truck took out a section in a 10 year old design. If it is an older design with a known flaw, like the corrosion issue of I-35 over the Mississippi in Minneapolis, they would need a new design. I looked up PCI certified manufacturers in the area. There is one of Howell Road by the rail tracks that can take 14th to Peachtree to the I85 connector. Their is also ones in Conley, Jonesboro, and Hiram. I don’t know any of their cast limits. Savannah has a yard with a huge cast limit in both height, length and tension pull, but the spans would not get through the Macon connection at the end of I-16.
Looks like they did the 5th runway bridge over 285, so they can probably handle it!
Key Projects
– 5th Runway at the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport
– International Boulevard
– West Paces Ferry – re-design – value engineering
– 5th Street Bridge over I-75
– Atlanta People Mover
– Northwest Corridor
Products
– Corporate and Support Staff AASHTO Modified Type I girders
– AASHTO Type II, III and IV girders
– PCI Bulb Tee Girders
– Box Beams
– Haunch Beams
Never know when you might need some haunch beams.
Terri,
I was waiting for your full report on the latest Hamilton covers released last Friday.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/wait-for-it/id1212587851?i=1212588887
I have no doubt GDOT will let another contractor, if not C.W. Mathews themselves as they are the 800 lb. gorilla in GDOT projects, slide on a project date on other ones to give this one a priority. They could even go retro and use poured in place beams which require a lot more steel. Yes, one thing that cannot be hurried is the time concrete takes to cure to enable load handling under tension. The spans in this section however are only ~120 feet. Replacing the 4 sets of columns and their footings is why I’m surprised at the early date. That is a lot of heavy pours.
Non-politics question: I am getting ready to toss some really old laptops. Is there a site i can go to online to use an over write program to “wipe” the hard drives? If so , can one of you attach that link? Thanks!
You can email Hillary World and ask how they did it…. (Snicker)
LOL! What was that? Bleach Bit or something…
Take the hard drive out and hit it with a hammer until it’s in a lot of little piece. Sometimes things are easier than they appear.
That actually comes after the HD is erased. I actually take those silver HD disks and shred them. I have too much work related content to let anything survive.
If you shred them you have no worries about a software wipe. Yeah, there are programs out there that pass the old DoD standard with about 2 days of writing 1s, then 0s, etc. but this goes back to an age when pcs were $5,000 and hard drives were at least a grand. These days most everyone I know gives them to a security company that throws the entire hard drive into an industrial shredder onsite and observable by the company’s representatives. The Eiger is correct. Get a sledge hammer and work out your frustrations. If you are extra paranoid run a strong magnet over the remains.
Got hold of a guy who’ll come to the house and destroy the entire laptop in some kind of monster shredder. Just toss the whole thing in. Sounds like he’s the go-to guy!
“This is anywhere from a 10 to a 20 year process, 17 agencies, hundreds and hundreds of permits…29 different statutes…We’re going to be able to get rid of 95% of that…and still get protection.” President Trump, talking about new highway construction at ‘White House CEO Town Hall’.
Lets just say he ‘does all that’… (Piff) How does he pay for it?
*waves hands* Magic!
Apparently no one knew it would be so complicated.