Punditry Doesn’t Make Policy

This week’s Courier Herald column:

Nine years ago I created a fake name to make a joke on an obscure political blog. The next three years were fun. I made jokes – often at the expense of others, gained a small cult following, and had a good bit of fun while talking about one of my favorite topics.

Eventually the inside joke had run its course and I decided to let people know who I was – “nobody” – and move on. As has become custom, it didn’t work out that way. A little over a year later instead of moving on and back to my re-established professional life, I was made editor of the blog. With that title came another. I was proclaimed “The Peach Pundit”.

In the early years I wanted to remain totally anonymous so I left few clues about who I was. It taught me how to argue. I couldn’t rely on my degrees, experience, or other credentials to buttress my positions. Without realizing it I gave myself three years of on the job training in written persuasion.

The almost six years since have also been an amazing journey. I’ve learned much more about the audience that we had cultivated, and who was paying attention. It caused me to get a bit more serious – both with maturity and with purpose – and try to figure out what to do with a platform I had accidentally stumbled upon.

Over this time, old and new media came quite a bit closer together. In the course of a given week I’ll find my work on blogs, newspapers, radio, and television. Even much of that started because I could, not because I even wanted to or had a reason to.

The journey exposed me to a lot. There was much trial and error along the way. They were mostly inevitable given that there are no road maps for this kind of trip. And what a long strange trip it’s been.

Three years ago I needed to make a choice. Corporate changes at my day job told me I had to prepare to change jobs. If I stayed in the old industry I was likely to have a different schedule and learning curve that would require me to curtail if not eliminate my writing and political activities. If I decided to double down, there was no clear business model and even less certainty of acceptance. I have, after all, been quite critical of many current state leaders and some major influential institutions.

A bigger choice for the bigger picture also needed to be made. Blogging had changed. Old media’s acceptance and relationship with us had changed. The people that we routinely criticized went from pretending “nobody reads them” to actively trying to ensure we had the facts we needed to shape our opinions.

In short, it was clear we had the attention of those we covered and access to the public whose opinion we wanted to shape. The big question for me, and for anyone else in opinion media, is how do we want to use this platform.

Too many in the blogosphere, talk radio, and other forms of political media use their platforms to throw stones. It’s pretty easy to stoke existing rage, point to complex issues that many don’t understand, and galvanize a skeptical public against anyone that’s actually trying to solve problems.

The bigger challenge is to work with those that you don’t agree with. Finding common ground and informing with facts is significantly harder than being critical without rolling up your own sleeves to first see all sides to an issue.

“Punditry” in its modern form only requires a platform and the ability to shout louder than anyone who may disagree. Good policy, however, is something that you do not win by filibuster. It requires persuasion. It requires consensus. And it requires working with those across a broad range of ideology.

The choice I made three years ago led me to become Executive Director of PolicyBEST, a policy think tank focused on solving real problems that I care about. We have plenty of issues that affect all Georgians, not just those from my corner of the political spectrum.

The choice I made this week is to give back my “pundit” title. I’ve moved on from my original blogging home and on to a new website. It is one where I hope we’ll have a true battle of ideas, and eschew exercises in group think.

I’ll still be around on these pages, and will continue to focus most of these columns on solutions. There are plenty of folks that like to cover the political horse races (and from time to time a bit of that will be covered here too). But the need – and what I’ve found that I enjoy through this circuitous process – is elevation and discussion of critical issues. I hope you’ll join me in the ongoing discussion at GeorgiaPol.com.


Charlie Harper is the Executive Director of PolicyBEST, a public policy think tank focused on issues of Business & Economic Development, Education, Science & Medicine, and Transportation. He’s also the publisher of GeorgiaPol.com, a website dedicated to State & Local politics of Georgia.

4
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
GinnyNathanTeriTheManUndertheBridge Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
TheManUndertheBridge
TheManUndertheBridge

Hi ya Charlie,

We have gone ’round the fence with ideas, drank together, and shared a space for a good run ‘over there.’

Best luck in this new site and with PolicyBEST.

By the way, while punditry may not make policy – it sure can influence policy. That last point is what I hope this site can become: A ‘goto’ place whereby law/policy makers can be exposed to ideas, FACTS, and opinions, in order to fulfill the honorable goals and beneficial objectives you so eloquently strive to achieve.

Teri
Teri

Facts are friendly! The same facts can inform different opinions and worldviews and, hopefully, the facts as they pertain to Georgia politics and policy will continue to be key to discussions here.

Nathan
Nathan

I know I’m a partisan. Heck, I wouldn’t be in GOP leadership if I weren’t, but I think we do take partisanship a little bit to the extreme these days (e.g., don’t vote for this education bill even if it pushes authority down to the local school boards because Common Core; support this legislation because it’s a red meat issue). That extreme partisanship allows for conservative talk radio hosts to cultivate disgruntledness with legislators both in Atlanta and Washington. I’m sure they’re making a beautiful dollar off of that anger. Those of us who are here aren’t normal. We enjoy… Read more »

Ginny
Ginny

Indeed, Nathan. This presidential cycle seems to have brought out the worse. Both sides are dug in and any type of discussion, much less dissension is met with attacks. We are surrounded by the Shrieking Eels.